CRIMINAL CHARGES SHOULD BE BROUGHT AGAINST LAUSD'S SUPERINTENDENT JOHN DEASY

Smiling John Deasy.jpg
(Mensaje se repite en Español) Whether the Los Angeles Unified School District's (LAUSD) Superintendent John Deasy is criminally culpable for his actions in dealing with Pearson and Apple on behalf of the district concerning his clearly collusive actions in complete derogation of the public bidding process designed to get the best contract price and terms for the district should be determined by a criminal cause of action brought by the Los Angeles District Attorney. In addition, any other state or federal governmental authority that sees the potential violation of law in Deasy's specifically intended actions might also consider filing charges. Only such a forum is designed to get at the truth in this matter, because it has the legal process, e.g. discovery, deposition, and the compulsory gathering of relevant evidence that up until now has been retained and stonewalled by LAUSD in this IPad affair and many other questionable actions that LAUSD, Deasy, and present and prior administrators have engaged in without any public scrutiny. Surely, such a defective process remains a formula designed to foster continued improper actions that have finally become public in the IPad affair.

27

08 2014

LAUSD'S SLEAZY DEASY STEALS A LINE FROM THE LATE GILDA RADNER: IPADS? "NEVER MIND"

Calvera.jpg
(Mensaje se repite en Español) With Superintendent John Deasy's morally challenged behavior in dealing with Pearson, Apple, and IPads, we get another glimpse of the real darkness of the privatization agenda, which is too evil for most to believe or process. It comes down to money and the further dumbing down of Americans to the point where they are incapable of sequencing enough fact together to "question authority."

26

08 2014

LAUSD BOARD ELECTION BETWEEN MCKENNA AND JOHNSON- IS THE BEST VOTE NO VOTE?

McKennaandJohnson.jpg
(Mensaje se repite en Español) In the 1998 Warren Beatty film Bulworth, the scene in the Black church on Vermont, when he tells the folks present that the only time they will see politicians is when they want their vote, is reminiscent of the LAUSD District 1 race between George McKenna and Alex Johnson to replace recently deceased Marguerite LaMotte. But when it comes to the toxic daily and generational reality that people in this district and their kids continue to face, nothing will change. While I personally held my nose and sent in my absentee ballot for George McKenna this week, at some point in my adult life I would love to vote for something more than the lesser of two evils. McKenna clearly knows his way around the self-serving old boy network, so one might wonder as to why this seasoned "educational expert" hasn't been successful in changing LAUSD's ingrained culture of failure up until now?

23

07 2014

2014 LATINO STUDENT REALITY AT LAUSD- ABSENT IN ESPARZA & OLMOS' 2006 FILM "WALKOUT"

Walkout.jpg
(Mensaje se repite en Español) At the end of the film, the LAPD undercover officer who had successfully infiltrated those organizing the walkouts from Lincoln, Wilson, Garfield, Roosevelt, and Belmont High Schools had the most insightful statement, which he made to the young chicana who is the film's star and the audience's surrogate, "Schools aren't going to change." To the producers of Walkout, who I have always respected, I would ask them if they might be willing to consider a sequel- working title Walkout II- where the children and grandchildren of those depicted in the film finally teach gabachos the meaning of the Spanish phase Ya Basta.

21

07 2014

When Did Teacher Unions Decide to "TURN" Against Collective Bargaining Rights? By Kathleen Carroll

Kathleen Carroll 2.jpeg
(Mensaje se repite en Español) We watch the chaotic struggles against mass school closures, mass teacher-school employee layoffs, and the proliferation of charter schools. We see the expansion of charter school management organizations and online learning, testing, with associated tech companies taking huge chunks of education tax dollars. We then hear politicians claiming what we have is a budget crisis, yet many of the same names appear over and over. The profiteers that usually emerge within the debate about privatizing public education include Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Eli & Edythe Broad Foundation, Walton Family Foundation, Michelle Rhee and her Students First, and the Milken Foundation, just to name a few.

AFT L.A. CONVENTION- TRUTH, PLATITUDES...AND NO ACTION

Randi Weingarten.jpg
(Mensaje se repite en Español) The hardest lies to address are ones embedded in truth. As the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) convention opened in Los Angeles on Friday, July 11th with the keynote speech. President Randi Weingarten clearly laid out the 5 point battle plan of those seeking to dismantle what remains of public education in the United States for money and the further dumbing down of America. However, what she didn't lay out was her own hand in facilitating this process by assuring that the AFT she heads and its locals around the country do absolutely nothing to stop this privatization juggernaut.

FORMER CTC ATTORNEY KATHLEEN CARROLL LAYS OUT UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN UNION AND PUBLIC EDUCATION PRIVATIZERS

Kathleen Carroll.jpg
In the YouTube video below Kathy Carroll, whistleblower attorney from the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC) and public education advocate talks about the sustained attacks on teachers and public education that continues to be facilitated by the incestuous illegal relationship of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the National Education Association (NEA) union leadership with privately funded non-profits, whose unrelenting shared agenda is to push for the complete privatization of public education.

10

07 2014

TO FINALLY FIX PUBLIC EDUCATION- IS TIMELY STUDENT REGRESSION A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE TO EQUALLY FAILED CONCEPTS OF SOCIAL PROMOTION OR RETENTION?

Thomas Jefferson.jpg
(Mensaje se repite en Español) Between dishonest social promotion of students without prior and current grade-level standards mastery or the alternative of often degrading retention for another year of what the student didn't get the first time around- and is even less like to get the second- is the much more viable alternative of student regression to a level of educational expectation that the student has the subjective ability to profit from. While the word regression is often exclusively understood in its pejorative sense, a more relevant understand of regression in the context of public education would be to allow a student to be moved back academically as soon as possible to a level where they can actually function irrespective of an arbitrary grade-level designation that has up until now given precedence to appearances and not reality.

SOCIAL PROMOTION- LAUSD'S PRIME MOVER FOR CONTINUED AND PREDICTABLE STUDENT FAILURE- DID THEY EVER REALLY WANT THESE KIDS TO LEARN?

social promotion.jpg
(Mensaje se repite en Español) I know teachers didn't create social promotion. They, like the students, are just victims of it, since students not being required to master prior grade-level standard precludes a subsequent single-subject credential teacher from doing their jobs- but not from being set up for the blame- which dovetails nicely into an argument for corporate privatization of public education, so that these crooks can get their hands on 40% of the $1 trillion at stake- think credit default swap and sub prime for comparable scams. Did you know Green Dot Charters is traded on the New York Stock Exchange?

SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN HOBBY LOBBY- A FURTHER SYMPTOM OF A PURPOSEFULLY DUMBED DOWN SOCIETY?

Hobby Lobby.jpg
(Mensaje se repite en Español) "Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it." ― Edmund Burke It's one thing if a people don't know their history, because they forgot it. It's quite another thing if they don't know their history, because they were purposefully never taught it. If my religious belief is offended by science, do I now have the right to deprive you of studying, learning, and benefiting from science? In a country that has come to treat public education as a dispensable commodity that can be privatized for profit without any consequences, the latest Supreme Court 5-4 ruling in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. seems to support this contention and should give us pause as to just how far we want to allow the purposeful cultivation of an ignorant population that has the right to shove their stupidity down all of our throats, if in so doing they are merely furthering their free exercise of religion under the 1st Amendment.

Also...