EVER WONDER WHY UTLA DOES NOTHING TO PROTECT TEACHERS? WHY NOT POSE THAT QUESTION TO UTLA'S DISBARRED CARL JOSEPH

Collusion.jpg

(Mensaje se repite en Español)

There is an eerie similarity between how the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) and United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) are run. Both leaderships are populated by refugees from the untenable classroom, who have sought upward mobility by getting as far away from a classroom as possible. In addition, there is another similarity: Both LAUSD and UTLA have leaderships that are at the mercy of entrenched bureaucracies that actually run the respective organizations for their own benefit, rather than what the respective leaderships want...or are even aware of.

When it comes to LAUSD, the Board is made up of part-time employees who completely rely on the District's entrenched bureaucracy for all their information upon which they base all their decisions. Ever month over the last several years, this board has voted to dismiss hundreds of teachers based solely on what they have been told by their staff that was there long before these board members were elected and will be there long after they are gone. None of the charges against the vast majority of teachers brought before the board for dismissal were true and none of them were verified under penalty of perjury as is required by law. And yet the LAUSD Board rubber stamps its bureaucracy.

 In UTLA, the situation is pretty much the same. The seven out of classroom officers are totally dependent for all their knowledge on an overcompensated entrenched bureaucracy that is really calling the shots based on the sole criteria of what benefits them and the dysfunctional status quo and not the teachers that pay their salaries. So when it comes to thousands of teachers wiling away years in teacher jail/rubber room "housing" without any timely charges or valid evidence against them and in complete derogation of LAUSD Bulletin Policy, the LAUSD/UTLA Collective Bargaining Agreement, and both state and federal law, don't expect Warren Fletcher and Co. to even be aware of the gravity of this outrage, let alone be aware enough to do anything about it- they are just figureheads.

Case in point: Ask yourself what kind of organization, let alone teachers' union, would hire a disbarred lawyer like Carl Joseph who had his license to practice law revoked for moral turpitude? Who would hire and pay an estimated $160,000 a year plus generous benefits to such a person and then trust them with the professional lives of its teachers? Given these circumstances and other showing equally questionable judgement, Is it any wonder that UTLA continues to roll over for LAUSD by passively sitting by and doing nothing to stop the targeting and removing of what now amount to thousands of teachers without cause.


In re Joseph (1989) 49 Cal.3d 430 , 261 Cal.Rptr. 407; 777 P.2d 180

[No. S010266. Supreme Court of California. August 23, 1989.]

In re CARL GARRETT JOSEPH on Disbarment

(Opinion by The Court.)

COUNSEL

John Yzurdiaga for Petitioner.

Diane C. Yu, Truitt A. Richey, Jr., Marta B. Galeano, Harriet Cohen and Christina Hill for Respondent. [49 Cal.3d 431]

OPINION

THE COURT.

[1] Carl Garrett Joseph, admitted to practice in 1976, pleaded nolo contendere to two felonies: falsifying government documents (Gov. Code, § 6200), and appropriation of money by an officer of the state. (Pen. Code, § 424, subd. 1.) The trial court placed him on probation with certain conditions, including that he serve nine months in jail. We referred the matter to the State Bar for a hearing, report, and recommendation on the question whether the facts and circumstances surrounding the commission of the offenses involved moral turpitude or other misconduct warranting discipline and, if so found, what discipline should be imposed. The State Bar's report has now been filed; the review department concludes that Joseph's offenses involved moral turpitude and recommends that Joseph be disbarred.

Joseph has filed objections but has not requested oral argument (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 951(d)). This court, after reviewing the entire record and considering all the facts and circumstances, has concluded that Joseph's offenses involved moral turpitude and that he should be disbarred.

It is therefore ordered that the name of Carl Garrett Joseph be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be disbarred from the practice of law in the State of California. It is further ordered that Joseph comply with the provisions of rule 955 of the California Rules of Court, performing the acts specified in subdivisions (a) and (c) of that rule within 30 and 40 days, respectively, after the effective date of this order. (See Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6126, subd. (c).) This order is effective upon finality of this opinion. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 24(a).)

If you or someone you know has been targeted and are in the process of being dismissed and need legal defense, get in touch: 


Lenny@perdaily.com

En Español 

Existe una similitud entre la forma extraña de Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) y los Maestros Unidos de Los Ángeles (UTLA) se ejecutan. Ambos líderes están pobladas por refugiados del aula insostenible, que han buscado ascenso al obtener tan lejos de un salón de clases como sea posible. Además, hay otra similitud: ambos LAUSD y UTLA tiene liderazgos que están a merced de las burocracias atrincheradas que realmente dirigen las organizaciones respectivas para su propio beneficio, en lugar de lo que los líderes respectivos quieres ... o siquiera son conscientes de.
Cuando se trata de LAUSD, la Junta está formado por empleados a tiempo parcial que dependen totalmente de la burocracia atrincherada del Distrito para toda su información en la que basan todas sus decisiones. Siempre mes durante los últimos años, este foro ha votado para despedir a cientos de maestros en base únicamente en lo que ha sido informado por su personal que estaba allí mucho antes de que estos miembros del consejo fueron elegidos y estará allí mucho después de que hayan desaparecido. Ninguno de los cargos en contra de la gran mayoría de los docentes ante el consejo para el despido fuese verdad y ninguno de ellos fueron verificados bajo pena de perjurio, como es requerido por la ley. Y sin embargo la Junta del LAUSD sellos de goma de su burocracia.
 En UTLA, la situación es más o menos lo mismo. El siete de los oficiales de clase son totalmente dependientes de todos sus conocimientos en una compensación excesiva burocracia atrincherada que es realmente la última palabra sobre la base de un criterio único de lo que les beneficia y el status quo disfuncionales y no a los maestros que pagan sus salarios. Así que cuando se trata de miles de maestros wiling distancia años en la cárcel maestro / goma habitación "vivienda" sin cargos ni pruebas oportunas válidos en su contra y una derogación completa del LAUSD Policy Bulletin, el Acuerdo LAUSD / UTLA negociación colectiva y del estado y ley federal, no esperes Warren Fletcher y compañía a ser siquiera conscientes de la gravedad de este escándalo, y mucho menos ser lo suficientemente conscientes para hacer algo al respecto-no son más que figuras decorativas.
Caso en cuestión: Pregúntese qué tipo de organización, vamos sindicato de maestros Alone ', sería contratar a un abogado inhabilitado como Carl Joseph que tenía su licencia para ejercer la abogacía revocada por depravación moral? ¿Quién contrata y paga un estimado de $ 160.000 al año, más generosos beneficios a una persona y luego confiar en ellos con la vida profesional de sus maestros? Teniendo en cuenta estas circunstancias y otras que muestran juicio igualmente cuestionable, ¿Es de extrañar que UTLA continúa rodando por encima de LAUSD pasivamente sentado y no hacer nada para detener los ataques y la eliminación de lo que ahora ascienden a miles de maestros sin causa.


In re Joseph (1989) 49 Cal.3d 430, 261 Cal.Rptr. 407; 777 P. 2d 180
[No. S010266. Corte Suprema de California. 23 de agosto 1989.]
In re CARL GARRETT JOSEPH en inhabilitación
(Dictamen de la Corte.)
ABOGADO
John Yzurdiaga del peticionante.
Diane C. Yu, Truitt A. Richey, Jr., Marta B. Galeano, Harriet Cohen y Christina Hill por la Demandada. [49 Cal.3d 431]
OPINIÓN
EL TRIBUNAL.
[1] Carl Joseph Garrett, autorizado para ejercer en 1976, se declaró nolo contendere a dos delitos: falsificación de documentos públicos (Código de Gobierno, § 6200), y la apropiación de dinero por un funcionario del Estado. (Código Penal, § 424, subd. 1.) El tribunal de primera instancia lo puso en libertad con ciertas condiciones, incluyendo que él cumplirá nueve meses de cárcel. Hemos remitido el asunto a la Abogacía del Estado para una audiencia, informe y recomendación sobre la cuestión de si los hechos y circunstancias que rodean la comisión de las infracciones relativas depravación moral o falta de conducta, disciplina y garantizando, de ser así encontrado, lo que la disciplina debe ser impuesta. El informe de la Abogacía del Estado ha sido presentada, el departamento de revisión concluye que los delitos de José involucrado depravación moral y recomienda que José fuera inhabilitado.
Joseph ha presentado objeciones, pero no ha solicitado los informes orales (Reglas Cal. de la Corte, la regla 951 (d)). Este tribunal, después de revisar todo el expediente y teniendo en cuenta todos los hechos y circunstancias, llegó a la conclusión de que los delitos de José involucrado bajeza moral y que debe ser inhabilitado.
Por lo tanto, ordenó que el nombre de Carl Joseph Garrett ser borrado de la lista de abogados y que se le inhabilitado del ejercicio de la abogacía en el Estado de California. Además, se ordenó que José cumplir con las disposiciones del artículo 955 de las Normas de la Corte de California, la realización de los actos previstos en los incisos (a) y (c), respectivamente, de dicha norma, en los 30 y 40 días, después de la fecha de vigencia de esta orden. (Véase el autobús. & Prof. Code, § 6126, subd. (C).) Esta orden es efectiva desde la firmeza del presente dictamen. (Reglas Cal. de la Corte, el artículo 24 (a).)
Si usted o alguien que usted conoce ha sido blanco de ataques y están en proceso de ser despedido y la necesidad de defensa legal, póngase en contacto:


Lenny@perdaily.com

13

03 2013

3 Comments

I am an LAUSD teacher who has been told that I will be SUSPENDED WITHOUT PAY. The administrator waited till the end of the year ... and, as yet, has NOT stated the allegations against me.
I am expected to come into her office and defend myself. I have absolutely NO idea what I am defending. I have made various attempts to reach UTLA, but UTLA is not responding. I guess I'll face the firing squad blind-folded.

Please contact me Brenjo. I am sorry to hear this happened to you, but you are not alone. My email is radaxis7@aol.com. I can arm you with some codes and emotional pointers. I will send you my number as soon as I hear from you. Please reach out asap.

These so-called human beings are not nearly as oblivious as you imply here. They know what is going on. We can prove Joseph acted as a lawyer fir UTLA while he was disbarred from 1989 to 1998. Indeed, I explained this to state bar, which lost interest as soon as the dates were spoken. It is too far back. However, the moral turpitude of Joseph, like Deasy is not completely beneath the radar. And moreover, these jackles are not liikely to change their spots. So let's sniff them out and put them on blast. Send what you know to radaxis7@aol.com.

Leave a comment