WILL THE REAL PROFESSOR DIANE RAVITCH PLEASE STAND UP?

Diane Ravitch.jpeg
(Mensaje se repite en Español)

Professor Diane Ravitch has become a G-d to her undiscerning and often cultish followers. What most of these people choose to see is her clearly unsurpassed knowledge of what is and has gone on in public education throughout the last 150 years. Without question she could be a revolutionary rallying point for countering the carefully planned and orchestrated program of public education privatization by charter schools run exclusively to increase the corporate bottom line and further dumb down the American public. However, the fact is that Ravitch has chosen to do nothing but talk and then only after the fact as can be seen in the recent Vergara case. This should have awakened her followers, but alas it hasn't. 

In lieu of really organizing and funding of a true opposition to the corporate agenda for public education, this self-silenced majority of Ravitch supporters still chooses to stand by and watch the decimation of a fairly compensated professional teacher corp and with it any chance of public education excellence. 

As long as Professor Ravitch's insights and alleged opposition to public education privatization continues in the same manner, while remaining undisseminated to the general public, this lack of a coordinated response will continue to redound to the unintended satisfaction of her supposed foes.

Alas, one might argue that Ravitch seems to have a pretty dark agenda, where she dodges the logical conclusions of her own ideas and the evidence that comes out of it on a daily basis as to the systematic deconstruction of public education by protesting, "I'm just a retired old gardener in Brooklyn with a bad knee, who doesn't have the energy to do more." But somehow, she puts in 8 hour plus days on her blog continuing to sap the energy potential of progressive educators who could alternatively really turn things around, if they understood the rat hole spending energy on the Ravitch Blog has come to be. 

Clearly, Diane will never do anything that actually challenges the status quo of her upper class origin in what it does not take a person of her intelligence to see is a purposefully failed public education system run for money.

Most enlightening- and where I got into it with her and her cult followers- was when she wrote an excellent analysis of the recent Vergara decision. Of course, only after Judge Treu had decided the case against teacher tenure. What Ravitch wrote after the fact pointed out and gave compelling evidence to show that the supposed experts, who had testified for the plaintiffs, were completely wrong. Ravitch showed that literally every supposed justification for depriving teachers of tenure were completely fabricated and made no sense, when put in historical context with the actual reasons for disparity loss of low seniority new teachers in the inner city schools. 

Why novice teachers were fired before seasoned and tenured veterans has more to do with no administrative support for minimal student behavior and the continued social promotion of students into grades where purposefully allowed deficient students could not possibly understand what a veteran single subject credentialed teacher was trying to teach. 

When tenured teachers were given and took the option of leaving, because of sufficient seniority, they logically took it by bidding for a higher functioning school as opposed to staying in a no-win inner city school with no administrative support and a program insured to fail and frustrate both the teacher and student. The resulting disproportionately number of novice teachers in inner city schools, who were the first to lose their jobs when cuts came, really had little to do with seniority, but rather an untenable school environment that seniority offered a rational escape from. 

The glaring omission that I asked Professor Ravitch about was, "If you know all this, why didn't you write an amicus brief or join with California Teachers Association (CTA) or other teachers unions in this case, before there was a court decision against teacher tenure?" One more time with the Ravitch litany, "Oh, I'm just a retired teacher- gardener who lives in Brooklyn with a bad knee." That bit of obfuscation was nothing compared to the brown storm of criticism I incurred for having the temerity of asking this question on Ravitch's own blog in the presence of her acolytes.

Alas, the corporate funded program to privatize public education in the United States remains alive and well and unchallenged. Not only for those at city, state, and the federal levels of government working to bring it about, but it is also supported by a rather sizable contingency of 5th columnists like Ravitch and those in UTLA, AFT, CTA, and other organizations who are doing quite well professionally and financially under this orchestrated war to privatize public education. Time to wake up and judge people by what they do and not their vacuous rhetoric?

If you or someone you know has been targeted and are in the process of being dismissed and need legal defense, get in touch: 


Lenny@perdaily.com

Blogs We Love

Do you find the media and their "teachers-suck," "power to principals," "privatization is the best thing that's happened to public schools" disgusting and distasteful?  The powers that be may "control" the main media but it's people like us who control the SOCIAL MEDIA. Hungry for more information about crusading educators going against the grain to do what's right for teachers, unions, communities, and children? Check out some more blogs below:



En Español

Profesora Diane Ravitch se ha convertido en un Di-s a sus seguidores sin discernimiento y, a menudo cultish. Lo que la mayoría de estas personas optan por ver es su conocimiento con claridad insuperable de lo que es y que ha sucedido en la educación pública a través de los últimos 150 años. Sin lugar a dudas de que pudiera ser un punto de encuentro revolucionario para contrarrestar el programa cuidadosamente planeado y orquestado de privatización de la educación pública por las escuelas charter funcionan exclusivamente para aumentar la línea de fondo corporativo y más embrutecer al público estadounidense. Sin embargo, el hecho es que Ravitch ha elegido hacer otra cosa que hablar y sólo después del hecho, como puede verse en el reciente caso Vergara. Esto debería haber despertado sus seguidores, pero por desgracia no es así. 

En lugar de realmente la organización y financiación de una verdadera oposición a la agenda corporativa de la educación pública, la mayoría de auto-silenciado de partidarios Ravitch sigue optando por esperar y ver la destrucción de una corporación profesional docente una compensación justa y con él cualquier posibilidad de público excelencia en la educación. 

Mientras ideas del profesor Ravitch y supuesta oposición a la privatización de la educación pública continúa de la misma manera, sin dejar de ser undisseminated al público en general, la falta de una respuesta coordinada continuará redundará en la satisfacción involuntaria de sus supuestos enemigos. 

Por desgracia, uno podría argumentar que Ravitch parece tener una agenda bastante oscuro, donde ella esquiva las conclusiones lógicas de sus propias ideas y la evidencia de que sale de ella a diario como a la deconstrucción sistemática de la educación pública por protestar: "Yo sólo soy un jardinero jubilado en Brooklyn con una rodilla mala, que no tiene la energía para hacer más ". Pero de alguna manera, se pone en 8 horas días más en su blog sigue minar el potencial energético de los educadores progresistas que podría alternativamente realmente cambiar las cosas, si se entiende el gasto de energía agujero de rata en el Blog Ravitch ha llegado a ser. 

Claramente, Diane nunca hará nada que realmente desafía el status quo de su origen de clase superior en lo que no hace falta ser una persona de su inteligencia para ver es un sistema de propósito se negaron plazo la educación pública-precio. 

La mayoría enlightening- y donde me metí en ello con ella y su culto seguidores- fue cuando escribió un excelente análisis de la reciente decisión de Vergara. Por supuesto, sólo después de que el juez Treu había decidido el caso en contra de los profesores titulares. ¿Qué Ravitch escribió después de los hechos señalados y dio pruebas contundentes para demostrar que los supuestos expertos, que habían testificado por los demandantes, estaban completamente equivocados. Ravitch mostró que literalmente cada supuesta justificación para privar a los maestros de la tenencia eran completamente inventada y no tenía sentido, cuando se ponen en contexto histórico con las razones reales de la pérdida disparidad de baja antigüedad nuevos maestros en las escuelas del centro urbano. 

¿Por qué los profesores noveles fueron despedidos antes de veteranos experimentados y titulares tiene más que ver con ningún apoyo administrativo para el comportamiento de los alumnos mínimo y la promoción social continuada de los estudiantes en los grados donde permitió a propósito alumnos deficientes no podían entender lo que un sujeto único maestro acreditado veterano estaba tratando de enseñar. 

Cuando se dieron los maestros permanentes y tomaron la opción de salir, debido a la antigüedad suficiente, que lógicamente lo tomaron por la licitación de una escuela de funcionamiento superior en lugar de permanecer en una escuela del centro de la ciudad que nadie gana sin el apoyo administrativo y un programa asegurado a fallar y frustrar tanto el profesor y el alumno. El número desproporcionadamente resultante de los profesores noveles en las escuelas del centro urbano, que fueron los primeros en perder sus puestos de trabajo cuando llegaron los recortes, en realidad tenía poco que ver con la antigüedad, sino más bien un ambiente escolar insostenible que la antigüedad ofrece un escape racional de. 

La omisión flagrante que le pregunté a la profesora Ravitch sobre fue: "Si sabes todo esto, ¿por qué no escribes un amicus curiae o unirse a la Asociación de Maestros de California (CTA) o de otros sindicatos de maestros, en este caso, antes de que hubiera una decisión judicial contra la tenencia de la maestra? "Una vez más con la letanía Ravitch, "Oh, yo sólo soy un jardinero maestro-retirado que vive en Brooklyn con una rodilla mala." Ese poco de ofuscación era nada comparado con la tormenta marrón de crítica incurrí por tener la osadía de hacer esta pregunta en el propio blog de Ravitch en presencia de sus acólitos. 

Por desgracia, el programa financiado por las empresas a privatizar la educación pública en los Estados Unidos sigue siendo vivo y bien y sin respuesta. No sólo para los que están en la ciudad, el estado y los niveles federales de gobierno que trabajan para llevarla a cabo, sino que también es apoyado por una contingencia más importante de quinta columnistas como Ravitch y los de UTLA, AFT, CTA y otras organizaciones que están va muy bien profesionalmente y financieramente bajo esta guerra orquestada para privatizar la educación pública. Hora de despertar y de juzgar a las personas por lo que hacen y no su retórica vacua? 

Si usted o alguien que usted conoce ha sido blanco de ataques y está en proceso de ser despedido y necesita defensa legal, póngase en contacto: 

Lenny@perdaily.com

21

10 2014

11 Comments

Yes, the public ed system is being purposely failed in order to advance an agenda, an agenda that cannot separated from what is going on in our country as a whole. Neoliberlism is the problem; it is worldwide in the attempt to pilfer public institutions for private gain.

However, that doesn't truly address what is happening to individual teachers around the country. The truth of the matter is, teachers have NO rights, NO protections, their mythical "tenure" notwithstanding which is only the same rights to a sham hearing as other qualified public employees. People who haven't been through the process, including most teachers, have utterly no clue the games public school districts play to get rid of unwanted employees. They violate the law because they CAN. Administrative law, contracts, even civil law in general, is toilet paper to them. Their lawyers tell them you can do whatever you want, force the wronged party to sue, settle, and sign that all-important gag order so the district can go around and target others. THIS is the dirty secret in public ed, the abuse of the legal system to protect administrators. Try getting any lawyer to take your case when you are dumped--it is almost impossible. Try finding any union attorney who will tell you of your rights to file an EEOC claim or recommend civil options in addition to the administrative hearings--it's almost impossible. Try resuming any kind of career after being illegally fired--it's almost impossible. Try pulling yourself out of destitution because of a school district's illegal termination--it's almost impossible.

Until we have an honest look at how school district legal teams and administrators truly operate and how teachers' rights are routinely trashed, nothing will change.

And it isn't just limited to teachers. At my old school district, Washoe County School District in Nevada, there has been a huge outcry over the district's illegal dumping of its superintendent Pedro Martinez (who was a Broad academy graduate) because the school board wanted somebody they could control easier. His contract was completely trashed, the state Open Meeting Law violated (the board members responsible were fined 1500 apiece for that). He sued, just as the district hoped he would, settled, and had to sign a gag order. The district "won" despite its reputation being thrown into the gutter over this controversy. They got him out. That was the important thing. Similar things happen to teachers all the time, but the public very rarely hears about it. In the Martinez case, the public got to see the district for what it really is. Multiply that by thousands of school districts and thousands of teachers and other district staff every year. It's a huge problem.

School districts operate above the law because they can. It isn't "their" money that they waste. The legal system is not supposed to be used as a first resort, but school districts routinely do it.

Amen. EEOC and DFEH have no money to either investigate or litigate on behalf of the thousands of teachers and others who have already been targeted and after which they filed clear, concise, and evidentiary convincing complains and gotten their right to sue. But EEOC and DFEH do nothing...which is also what the L.A. City District Attorney does and which Kamala Harris' Attorney General Office does- NOTHING. Ruslyn Ali who was Assistant Secretary of Education knows exactly what is going on, but somehow no meaningful independent investigation takes place.

As you undoubtedly know by what you have written, none of the targeting of teachers and others could go on without the silence of state and federal regulatory. For example, will there ever be an independent investigation of Deasy's iPad scandal, the graduating of socially promoted students with fixed grades and assessments, and other blatant corruption that LAUSD and districts like it around the country make no attempt to hide, since the corporate owned media and foundation compromised NPR will say nothing...if they want to keep their jobs.

We are suing LAUSD, UTLA, and their attorneys Trygstad, Schwab & Trygstad. Any help would be greatly appreciated in what district document say usually take 7 years on average to conclude. Their motto: We can bleed longer than you can.

I am really confused, Leonard, about how Diane Ravitch is not helping from her POV in NY. She wrote a book, or more than one, that played a large part in teachers organizing and parents organizing against the corporate reform and its flawed policies et al. She has brought the problems to the attention of the tens of thousands who read her blog and her books. She disseminates information from many places by featuring other people's blogs. She arranged a debate (which didn't happen} with Michelle Rhee.

I remember her talking about the Vergara case in her blog before the verdict was in. What would you have her do? Go to court and testify? I daresay it wouldn't have made any NY, she spends a lot of time on NY issues, bringing them to light. But she had also featured New Orleans, Philadelphia, schools in FL, IN, OH and WI.

She has even published dissenting opinions on her blog. I don't think she is God but I certainly admire her stamina and willingness to get the information out.

I wish you well in your suit, as I believe the LA teachers got sucker punched with a decision that should have gone the other way. Just like we got sucker punched when the SRC unilaterally rescinded our contract last week.

Deasy is gone, left a burning school district in hos wake, and may your Los Angelinos pay attention and fix it. But don't blame Diane Ravitch for it.

Let me see if I can address your confusion. There are few if any academics who have a greater knowledge, awareness, and the celebrity to disseminate what is and has been going on in the war against teachers to privatize public education. That being said, when a brilliant academic like Professor Ravitch from her "POV in NY" witnesses the same systematic attack on high seniority teachers taking place all over the country- who are removed without even being afforded fundamental due process of law, e.g. no sworn charges under penalty of perjury, no independent forum to hear the case, no speedy trial (but rubber rooms for years to break the teacher physically and mentally), clearly fabricated charges, no presumption of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt, and no burden of proof on the district bringing the charges, but rather on the teacher, and the reality that 93% of targeted teachers are at the top of the salary scale at LAUSD and elsewhere around the country- and Ravitch says nothing, while remaining completely unwilling to address the teacher unions clear complicity, blatant corruption, and co-option by foundation money in this sick and destructive process, one is on clear inquiry notice to ask Professor Ravitch to reconcile her lack of relevant timely actions with her vast knowledge as to what is really going on. Her silence under these circumstances is deafening.

Professor Ravitch goes on Tavis Smiley Show and gives an eloquent explanation that teacher tenure is not a lifetime job guarantee, but rather due process rights for teachers who had up until receiving tenure had been employees at will. And then, she somehow fails to mention that tenured teachers all over the country at the top of the salary scale, and/or about to vest in expensive unfunded lifetime health benefits, and/or disabled WITH DUE PROCESS RIGHTS AND TENURED are being systematically removed without them being afforded anything even remotely resembling these basic due process rights- and Ravitch say nothing?

Hell, Tavis Smiley says nothing. Because if you don't want to go the way of Phil Donahue, who went from TV celebrity to obscurity in one week for crossing the invisible line of what the corporations will tolerate, you stay on script, so that you don't offend the 5 corporation who own all the media and subsidize NPR to the point of its emasculation, when it comes to really talking about what is going on in the war to privatize the more than $1 trillion a year public education biz. Want to put this in the context of a comparable scam? Think credit default swaps and sub prime. There too nobody said anything and nobody went to jail.

The examples of failing to speak when one clearly has the knowledge and the supposed progressive politics are significant, but let's just give you one more example:

In order to get rid of tenure and the fairly compensated veteran teachers it protects to bring down the cost of doing business for corporations privatizing public education, there were two collusive cases brought in California. The first was the Reed case. And the second was the more recent Vergara, where Superintendent John Deasy of LAUSD- a named defendant- testified on behalf of the plaintiffs. After the verdict by Judge Treu wiping out tenure, Professor Ravitch wrote an insightful series of arguments that completely decimated this put up Vergara case, the evidence, and the supposed expert witnesses. So why didn't she do anything before? No answer or a weak tea answer. If CTA, AFT, or any other teacher union got a call from Professor Diane Ravitch and she gave them what amounts to the amicus brief she published only after the fact, do you think any of them could have ignored her and not come up with the lawyer money to stop Vergara...before it was decided...unless they were already in on the fix.

The past do-nothing president of UTLA Warren Fletcher, who too did absolutely nothing to stop the war on teachers during his 3 year tenure coined an interesting way of describing what is going on between Ravitch- and other self-declared progressives, the unions, and the privatizers- he called it kabuki after the stylized Japanese dance where everybody has a series of predetermined moves that never vary.

Rather than address what I and others cannot help but notice- since no attempt is made to hide it, which is why they are so sloppy- I am vilified. But the substance of my assertions continue to remain ignored. I wonder if new LAUSD Superintendent for the 3rd time Ray Cortines would be interested in talking to me, since his latest media spin, since being named superintendent has been how much he "respects teachers." So why was he the one who started the war on senior teachers during his second tenure at LAUSD? Lenny, you ask too many questions in what ironically is the most anti-intellectual environment it has ever been my displeasure to experience.

Anne, thank you for the honest and calm tone of your question- I hope this answers your question or getting you into questioning authority.

"After the verdict by Judge Treu wiping out tenure, Professor Ravitch wrote an insightful series of arguments that completely decimated this put up Vergara case, the evidence, and the supposed expert witnesses. So why didn't she do anything before? No answer or a weak tea answer. If CTA, AFT, or any other teacher union got a call from Professor Diane Ravitch and she gave them what amounts to the amicus brief she published only after the fact, do you think any of them could have ignored her and not come up with the lawyer money to stop Vergara...before it was decided...unless they were already in on the fix."

I think you're grossly overestimating the quality and force of the critiques Ravitch wrote after the Vergara decision. They were basically a series of off-the-cuff observations and/or re-postings of other people's observations. Which is pretty much all she does nowadays. Also, although her she plays a populist on her blog, she is who she always was: elitist and completely disconnected from the lives of ordinary people.

With all due respect, the arguments made by the plaintiffs in both the earlier Reed case and in the subsequent Vergara case make no sense. So the succinct comments that Ravitch made afterwards were more than sufficient to blow holes in the Vergara premises and subsequent decision.

Given the blatant violation of various sections of the California Education Code, the LAUSD/UTLA Collective Bargaining Agreement, and fundamental rights guaranteed under both state and federal constitutions, it would have been a cakewalk to take what Ravitch wrote and couch it in relevant law.

Some relevant ideas and facts completely ignored by both the Reed and Vergara cases:


1. It was alleged that students' constitutional right to an education was violated by tenure, since as many as 65% percent of inner city faculties populated by novice teachers on emergency credentialed were removed. This was never put in the true context of schools filled with socially promoted students objectively incapable of doing the work, because they were without the mastery of prior grade level standards to do the work a single-subject credentialed teacher gave them, who did not have the time as well to teach them the foundational skills necessary to do the work.

With no support for reasonable discipline from LAUSD administration and pressure to fix assessments, grades, and pass students who did no grade-level work or be targeted for removal as a bad teacher, it is completely understandable why anybody with tenure and enough seniority did anything they could to get away from these schools.

2. Another false premise in Vergara was that novice teachers are better, because they are still idealistic. This presupposes that a tenured professional teacher with years of teaching in a variety of situations is worse that a recent college graduate, whose biggest motivation before moving on might just be paying off their student loans.

So tell me, would you want an intern operating on you or a 20 year veteran surgeon? Implicitly, teaching is not treated like a profession and nobody objects.

3. What is never mentioned is the approximately $60,000 a year for many years in combined salary and benefits saved by LAUSD when they hire a Teach for America type and get rid of a tenured high seniority and comparatively expense teacher. They also can use displaced teachers to stop substitutes from getting the 100 days of service they need to collect medical benefits. In short, the well-being of the students is the last thing LAUSD is concerned about.

If anybody is guilt of violating a student's right to an education, it is LAUSD administration and not the teachers who are merely trying to do an impossible environment made all the worse by LAUSD administrations blatant refusal to support them.

While there are many many more issues that make the collusive Vergara case something Ravitch's comments could have been used before the case was decided to beat it, something as obvious as a named defendant LAUSD had it's superintendent John Deasy testify on behalf of the plaintiffs in this completely phony case that neither Ravitch or the unions could find time to put their heads together to stop- it would have been easy, unless they too are not so secretly routing for the plaintiffs, supported by a billionaire, in this bogus case that should never have gone to court, let alone won.

Thanks for your comments. Much appreciated. JH

I absolutely agree with you. There is a war against teachers because the wolves of Wall Street want the money of the taxpayers like you and me. The real problems of education are poverty, drugs, broken families, over crowded schools, lack of support, ... I believe that we need leader like Cesar Chavez, Rosa Park.. We need to organize; we need to strike; we need to start fasting in front of strategic places like in front of LAUSD main building.

At the root of every other problem we face in this country is a purposefully failed public education system. In the 1950s and 60s when I went to LAUSD, it was the antidote for poverty, drugs, broken families...and lack of support," because irrespective of where a kid came from or their socio-economic status, they identified with common nuclear family middle class values Vibrant public education is not a luxury, but a basic necessity for any social that wants to remain viable.

When public education is used to maintain one group in power over everybody else by keeping other people in their place, the society doesn't continue to evolve and begins its decline.

This is outrageous. As an activist who has organized and led over a dozen protests on multiple issues in the last three years and attended even more, I can say that there is a role for everyone in the fight.

Diane Ravitch has done what Elizabeth Warren so arrogantly said she did when she said she created the intellectual foundation for Occupy Wall Street. Without Diane's book, blogs and research, activists like me would not have anything to post on our event pages to motivate people to act.

I can tell you it is a full time job to get people out in the streets for a protest or to organize a petition campaign or to set up citizen lobby meetings with legislators. I know, because I do all of those things. And I most certainly don't have time for all the research and writing that I rely upon others for.

The real question is et tu Mr. Isenberg? What the hell are you doing to create a movement?

Lauren,

I am suing LAUSD, UTLA, and UTLA's attorneys who have stood by and done nothing while thousands of dedicated teachers have had their livelihoods taken away on fabricated charges without a scintilla of evidence against them by an LAUSD Board that admits they voted to remove these teachers based exclusively on charges without any evidence or "verified testimony" to support them as is required by various sections of the California Education Code and the U.S. Constitution. By so doing, LAUSD saves approximately $60,000 in just the first year after they get rid of these teachers in saved salary and benefits by hiring a Teach for America type or the functional emergency credentialed equivalent. Is the general public aware of this? Does Ravitch have the celebrity, when she appears on The Tavis Smiley Show to mention it? Why doesn't she? This is going on all over the country. So, Lauren, do you think I am doing anything?

If what we have done and continue to do has been ignored with impunity and if there is a blackout in the mainstream media on this subject, because of the same corporate ownership that is trying to privatize public education ignores it, wouldn't you do something else than what Ravitch et al have been doing to no avail, since insanity is doing the same thing again and again and expecting a different result.

Don't get me wrong. I don't think the courts can possibly decide in favor of targeted teachers. One only has to look at the Miramonte sexual molestation scandal at LAUSD to know this. Only one teacher who molested his students for 18 years without any administrative intervention- they were probably too busy going after innocent teachers- is costing LAUSD in the millions. How much compensatory and punitive damages do you think would result if all the destroyed teachers, who have been unjustly targeted, were compensated for their direct and indirect losses? Could the states or federal government ever allow LAUSD or NYC School Districts to go bankrupt for their clearly illegal- no criminal actions- which they have made no attempt to hide. And where were the unions that Ravitch refuses to hold responsible? Pointing out collusive union activity that has made this war on teachers possible does not make one anti-union, just anti-corruption.

Now, once we lose in court and the public can see just how corrupt the system is, we might just then have the ability to bring about changes by radicalizing the 99% that want better. But a bunch of conscienti sitting around and blogging while the rest of American intelligencia doesn't have a clue is not going to cut it or change much of anything. I always describe this as The Staff Development Mentality- and all of us veteran teachers know just how much of what has been covered over the years at staff developments ever gets implemented. Not!

In Ferguson, Missouri a few guys who were videotaping bands and putting them up on the Internet in real time were able to get one million viewers in four hours, when they captured local police threatening the reporters covering the event. Couldn't we do the same thing with Ravitch and others who have the historical awareness to point out that NYC Public Schools came into existence in 1906 to overcome the rampant corruption of small charter-like schools. So why does Diane put this in her books and on her book tours and on her blog, but never out to the general public- parents- whose support and awareness are need if any of this is going anywhere while there is still time to stop the charter school privatization juggernaut. Do you know people who can manipulate the Internet rankings like Stephanie Abrams was hired to do on behalf of Superintendent John Deasy at LAUSD? If you do, then we can bring about quantifiable change and accountability. Right now, those in power are in awe as to how little resistant there has been to their war on teachers and public education.

But I'm the enemy?

Lenny

Leave a comment